Posts Tagged ‘apple’

OUTRAGEOUS – Apple kicks out 5,000 apps

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Mashable reports that Apple has removed 5,000 ‘babe’ apps from their store – on top of the controversial booting out of Wobble iBoobs.  These were apps that were previously allowed – but they’ve just changed their mind.  Let’s be clear – these are not adult apps: even bikinis are now banned.

Bad AppleIt’s outrageous enough that Apple dictates to the world what content is ‘appropriate’ – but what’s more outrageous is the lack of clear guidelines… and the constant mind changing.  Certainty is the most important thing – developers / brands cannot invest thousands in developing applications based on one set of guidelines, only for Apple to change its mind a few weeks later.  It’s just too expensive – businesses can’t be successful with that level of risk and uncertainty.

It’s much like the UK tax system – with certainty we can make informed decisions and invest / plan for the future (regardless of whether we like the policies), but when they constantly meddle it’s time to get out.

Who needs film censors, laws, ethics or parents when we’ve got Apple?  Why are R-rated movies and violent games like Grand Theft Auto acceptable, but girls in bikinis aren’t?

It’s a principle thing.  Apple is getting dangerous – they can’t be allowed to get away with it.

MWC is just not cool

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

MWC passWe’ve returned from an exhausting Mobile World Congress in Barcelona.

Despite all the hype around the ‘App Zone’ in Hall 7 – MWC is just not cool.  It doesn’t get it.  MWC is a load of hungover men in their 50s in suits talking about UGC and social networking – having never used either.  The show should stick to what it understands – handsets, infrastructure, billing systems, spectrum, mobile operators, backhaul etc.

The App Zone saw almost no disruptive, funky start-ups revolutionising mobile through augmented reality, social networking or similar.  Why?  Largely because it’s prohibitively expensive.  Entrance is 600 euros (though most blag passes from exhibitors), hotels are a fortune, flights are a fortune – and if you want to exhibit, a small stand (3m x3m) starts at about £9k from memory (we exhibited for two years before deciding it was not worthwhile).  Money that a start-up is probably better spending on more focussed PR / marketing / servers / salaries / whatever.

Other observations / highlights from MWC:

  • Google was dishing out free Nexus Ones and Droids / Milestones to all those who attended their Android Developer Lab. Word got out quickly and there was a scene of uncontrolled mayhem / carnage as everyone scrabbled for entrance into the developer event. Most of those scrabbling were those mentioned above – never having seen a line of code in their lives. Is Google dishing out so many free phones because 1) it’s made of money, 2) it’s clever to place devices in as many developers’ hands as possible, or 3) because they manufactured loads, sold few and are now giving them away to make way for the Nexus Two?
  • Swedish Beers – which did attract developers – was packed. Lots of free beers is a sure fire way of attracting developers and start-ups along.
  • Everyone was reporting that this year’s event was far quieter than previous events.
  • The SonyEricsson X10 is the sexiest thing I’ve ever held. I want one.
  • Windows Phone 7 Series might sound like a BMW but it actually looks pretty cool.  Shame we have to wait until Q3 (which will inevitably end up being Q4) – by which time it will probably be outdated.
  • Nokia was AWOL (who cares?). Apple and Google don’t exhibit because it’s beneath them. They hold their own events which generate far more buzz and hype. Nokia doesn’t – and it therefore needs to exhibit. Which they didn’t – adding further to the perception that they’re failing dismally to keep up with the rapidly advancing world around them.
  • Many small companies who previously exhibited were notably absent this year.
  • British Airways‘ usually friendly cabin crew were miserable and rude – cost cutting is obviously getting to them. Their sandwiches are also now truly revolting – far better on Easyjet where you pay for food, but get a choice and it tastes good.

MWC is good for a bit of networking and meeting everyone in one place – but it’s not what it was, and it’s totally failing to position itself at the forefront of today’s innovative mobile space. If you were there, what did you think?

iPhone/iPad – where’s the video calling?

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Apple iPadPrior to the unveiling of every new Apple device there is immense speculation about its features – Microsoft, Nokia and even Google must sit back in helpless awe and jealously watch the hype surrounding each announcement.  Steve Jobs is a marketing genius.

Few features have been more anticipated than video calling – it is expected in every device launch and never arrives.  It was rumoured back in 2008 in the original iPhone 3G, then the 3GS, then the iPad and iPhone OS 3.2 now apparently has hooks to allow for video calling.  But no devices have a front facing camera so that’s not much use.  Yet.

Third parties such as Fring offer video calling support on a variety of devices (now including the iPhone), though they have a long way to go on usability / quality (our tests showed it to be unusable on Nokia devices).

Video calling has not been the success that 3G networks hoped for – most 3G handsets and networks support video calling over a 64kb/s circuit (quality is moderate) – but today’s IP networks can handle higher bandwidth and higher quality.  Given Apple’s relentless pursuit of control, user experience and quality they’ve probably been waiting for the networks to catch up.  Which many have now.

What the market really needs is Apple to jump onto it – and provide a compelling user experience.  This will doubtless be via iChat – but third party apps are also likely to gain access to forthcoming front facing cameras through the SDK.

Given this week’s OS 3.2 announcements, what’s the betting that our next iPhone will have a front-facing camera?  It’s exciting – and will see mobile video calling finally hitting the mainstream.

Update 21.02.2010: Mashable is reporting even more evidence that video chat is on its way to the iPhone + iPad – it looks like it’s definitely more than rumour now!